FANDOM

Bennett Blood Mage18

aka ⛤The Bennett Witch⛧

Councilor ⚜ Administrator ⚜
  • I live in Mystic Falls, Virginia.
  • My occupation is a Servant of Nature. Administrator on The Vampire Diaries. Councilor.
  • I am the one and only Bennett Witch!
  • Bio To oppose us is to oppose the natural order. By choice or by force, the witches of the French Quarter will rise again.
  • [Show More]


TVD & TO Wiki Help and Rules

“I don't break Marcel's rules.”

AdminsManual of StyleCategoriesMediaFAQEditing FAQCiting sourcesCanonicity GuideSupportSpellingAudio/MusicBadgesUserboxes


Admin Council
A FANDOM user
  Loading editor
  • This is my first post. Yeah, it about my last post on the discussion forum. It was locked and you gave your reasons but when I checked Freya and Hope’s pages I didn’t see anything addressing my exact topic so it can’t be a fresh topic, and even on the discussion forum, can’t seem to find where this was discussed.

      Loading editor
    • Hello. Similar topics can be found on the first and second page of Freya and Hope's article comments, respectively (likewise, there are probably others on the Witch, The Hollow, or Dahlia's pages). Similarly the searching the Hope Article tag or The Originals category in Discussions can yield other points of Discussions. Briefly looking through, you've comment on a similar post that got off topic in relation to Hope. With that said, this, as well, as other comparisons (especially among witches) are not new; nor is there "new" information to be presented. Typically, this has the same users repeating the same information. Moreover these types of posts, particular in Discussions usually go off track pretty quickly. So with a little searching, there or here on the main namespace, similar posts can be found that likely answer or will provide you additional insight without have a repeat conversation. Hope that helps.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hi Bennett Blood Mage18 so i was right about sheriff mac and her children

      Loading editor
  • Hello can you restore my profile back to how it was as I was a creator of alot of pages on this wikia. Thanks.

    ~Insidervampire

      Loading editor
  • on the discussions board, am i allowed to make a forum to invite people to a tvd-originals-legacies talking forum board that I personally would moderate?

      Loading editor
    • View all 22 replies
    • Not every one is a troll. Those are usually pretty straight forward. Taking a break is often good. I've been doing it for a while off and on.

      Now, with that said, would you like me to directly inquire with a Staff member? I can ask them to evaluate the comment(s) (and review this and the other thread I mention) and/or offer their own insights? I know of a couple and can directly inquire with them now. I will likely be unable to respond too much more today.

        Loading editor
    • just next time shae has a problem with me, just tell him to back off a little, i hate to tattle tell but he wont listen to me at all, im not the one with a problem, he is

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • I want to update it since it's fairly filled with old information that doesn't apply anymore and besides under the bio part it reads "He has a cousin, Robbie Amell who is set to star in The CW's new show, The Tomorrow People." now I hardly qualifty that as someone's mini bio. 

      Loading editor
    • it can be updated, but do not copy content from wikipedia or other sources.

      Your previous edit was reverted because for whatever reason, you messed up the section when trying to duplicate the above information into trivia.

      Again, all these poor edits can be avoided if you check your edit prior to publishing it with the preview button or show changes.

        Loading editor
    • Ok got it but I making the part about his cousin as trivia tibid 

        Loading editor
    • This edit, here, is exactly why I said to double check and/or previous your edit, which would have made this edit unnecessary; though not-so-ironically, you made the same mistake once before, here.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • I'm pretty sure that creature lurking in the shadows of the cliffhanger of 'Hope is Not the Goal'  was the Dryad since the next epsiode picked up where we left off with Dorian and I recall her be the same creature that Dorian got a glismped of before she was properly seen 

      Loading editor
  • Hi, Bennett Blood Mage18 I was wondering why my edit to Lizzie Saltzman was removed.

      Loading editor
  • I'm guessing this has been asked before but I'm still new so how are Lana and Eve considered Hope's distant relatives? Is it just because their from the same pack that their considered distant relatives? I just don't get it It's confusing..

      Loading editor
    • They aren't considered family (this is still disputed every now and again, however) - though they're from the same werewolf clan.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • 'Superpowerful Witch' and 'Most powerful witch in all of history' are titles and should reflect that as such if other main characters bear titles of similar structure. It should be reverted.

    Also, I agree with the 'Acidic Blood Spell' change from the 'Blood poisoning Spell', but disagree with the removal of 'Forging Enchanted Thorns' and 'Strength Augmentation (on herself)' for the following reasons:

    1. The Hollow created the Enchanted Thorns, thus it should be among her significant spells list.

    2. The Hollow wouldn't have been able to pull a man three times her body size if it weren't by magical means.

      Loading editor
    • View all 13 replies
    • Calling Davina a Super witch by Josh and Hayley, as you pointed, is a description of power (her power at the time); it wouldn’t have been bestowed upon her if not for the speakers’ perception of her power. And the same context was used when Marcel called the Hollow “Super powerful...”. In all cases “Super” was the word used to describe the witch’s power.

      “Those description are used as lead-in within the character introduction and power sections”. I understand how descriptions are used as to introduce a character and in P&A sections, but can you use a statement that isn’t canon? Every witch who has “one of the most powerful witches in history/the world,” in their introduction or P&A sections have been literarily given that title either by a another character or by one of the writers in an interview. Vincent called the Hollow “the most powerful witch in all of history”. That is a canon statement, but this is not stated in her introduction page, or P&A section. To the best of my knowledge, he never called her “one of the most powerful witches in history,” which is different from the first title.

      The reason I do not agree with this is because Dahlia and a number of other witches have performed magical actions that were not outrightly stated to be spells or had any form of incantation (to suggest a spell was being cast) e.g Dahlia destroying the WO stake among the majority of her magical actions or her control of plants, yet they were added to Significant spells lists. If we clearly know that the Hollow created the Thorns that could kill an Original what’s stopping such to be on her list?

      Writing in bold to a person, especially in the context of an argument, especially the specific word “not” will be taken the wrong way. Though you’re an admin (one of the authorities here) and a very effective one, your word isn’t final, as there’s always room for re-evaluation and change by other admins and so on. Thus, writing with a bolded “not” mightn’t be the best way to resolve a problem. Saying it to any user at all, bolded or not, comes across as condescending. Do you understand what I’m trying to say?

        Loading editor
    • Josh said Super Witch - Hayley called her super all powerful; that is the difference.

      Where again,

      Bennett Blood Mage18 wrote: However, it wasn't quoted, which it has as of now.

      Which was shown here, prior to my comment (which you may or may not have checked the page since the previous).

      It is literally, quoted on the article --

      According to Vincent, the Hollow is much older than the Ancestors[2] and is one of "the most powerful witches in all of history".[3] Following her original death, she obtained followers to perform her dark deeds. Since her resurrection, her followers claim that she is more powerful than the Ancestors.[4]

      Again,

      Like I said I'll revisit it for the Spell and Rituals page, but spells are listed in the infobox from the Spells and Rituals page.

      Dahlia's is listed. I've not gotten around to the Hollow. And I'm pretty sure I've revised just about all, if not all, to reflect the spells and rituals pages, so please direct me to which other witch character hasn't been revised for format.

      It seems I'm having to repeat myself, so emphasis is needed because (1) as I've stated before, speculation is not to be added on to articles. (2) You're insisting otherwise, repeatedly, but have no proof, and I've had to repeatedly say the same thing (speculation will not be added). That is the only emphasis and or context I use bold in and speculation on articles have long standing on this (an just about any) community.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • I had a message on the comments page on season 2 of legacies and its gone



    I didnt shout, i didnt swear or threaten anyone, I simply said I dont like the spoilers I heard lately




    am I not allowed to voice my opinion anymore?

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.